GRID M6-8Q vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data6.57
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameR300GM204
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date22 January 2003 (23 years ago)30 August 2015 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1536
Core clock speed325 MHz722 MHz
Number of transistors110 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data100 Watt
Texture fill rate2.60069.31
Floating-point processing powerno data2.218 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs896
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotMXM Module
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed310 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.84 GB/s160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-5.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 January 2003 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm

GRID M6-8Q has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 436% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO and GRID M6-8Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO is a desktop graphics card while GRID M6-8Q is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1 1 vote

Rate GRID M6-8Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9700 PRO or GRID M6-8Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.