Radeon RX 7800 XT vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9500

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated30
Place by popularitynot in top-10084
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data67.92
Power efficiencyno data16.72
ArchitectureRage 8 (2002−2007)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameR300Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 July 2002 (22 years ago)25 August 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3840
Core clock speed277 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors110 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data263 Watt
Texture fill rate1.108583.2
Floating-point processing powerno data37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs4240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed270 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth8.64 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0 (9_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.2
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 July 2002 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 5 nm

RX 7800 XT has an age advantage of 21 year, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9500 and Radeon RX 7800 XT. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9500
All-In-Wonder 9500
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT
Radeon RX 7800 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9500 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 2773 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.