Quadro NVS 290 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1272
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.97
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV280G86
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date26 January 2004 (21 years ago)4 October 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$149

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed250 MHz459 MHz
Number of transistors36 million210 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data21 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0003.672
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02938 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data16 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR2
Maximum RAM amount128 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed164 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.624 GB/s6.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video1x DMS-59

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 4 October 2007
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 150 nm 80 nm

NVS 290 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 SE and Quadro NVS 290. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop graphics card while Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 290
Quadro NVS 290

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 23 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 SE or Quadro NVS 290, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.