HD Graphics 400 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1146
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data13.35
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)
GPU code nameRV280Braswell GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (22 years ago)1 April 2015 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data96
Core clock speed250 MHz320 MHz
Boost clock speedno data600 MHz
Number of transistors36 million189 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data6 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0007.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.1152 TFLOPS
ROPs42
TMUs412

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xRing Bus
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3L
Maximum RAM amount128 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed164 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.624 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.44.3
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 1 April 2015
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 14 nm

HD Graphics 400 has an age advantage of 11 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 971% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 SE and HD Graphics 400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop graphics card while HD Graphics 400 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 456 votes

Rate HD Graphics 400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 SE or HD Graphics 400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.