GeForce G205M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1421
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.20
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRV280C79
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (21 years ago)8 January 2009 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed250 MHz450 MHz
Number of transistors36 million314 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data14 Watt
Texture fill rate1.0003.600
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0352 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount128 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed164 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2.624 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.111.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.43.3
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 8 January 2009
Chip lithography 150 nm 65 nm

GeForce G205M has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 130.8% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 SE and GeForce G205M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 SE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce G205M is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
All-In-Wonder 9200 SE
NVIDIA GeForce G205M
GeForce G205M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 SE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 26 votes

Rate GeForce G205M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 SE or GeForce G205M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.