GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 LE

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated323
Place by popularitynot in top-10086
Power efficiencyno data28.60
ArchitectureRage 7 (2001−2006)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRV280TU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date26 January 2004 (21 years ago)23 April 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed250 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors36 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00095.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount128 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed166 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth2.656 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.112 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.44.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 26 January 2004 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 128 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1150% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 9200 LE and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 9200 LE is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 9200 LE
All-In-Wonder 9200 LE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 9200 LE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 1944 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 9200 LE or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.