Radeon R9 285 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated363
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data7.67
Power efficiencyno data6.45
ArchitectureR500 (2005−2007)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameRV515Tonga
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date22 December 2005 (19 years ago)2 September 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1792
Core clock speed450 MHz918 MHz
Number of transistors107 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data190 Watt
Texture fill rate1.800102.8
Floating-point processing powerno data3.29 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4112
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length249 mm221 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s176.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI2x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, 1x DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (12_0)
Shader Model3.06.5
OpenGL2.04.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 December 2005 2 September 2014
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm

R9 285 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 and Radeon R9 285. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300
All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300
AMD Radeon R9 285
Radeon R9 285

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 80 votes

Rate Radeon R9 285 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 2006 Edition X1300 or Radeon R9 285, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.