GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated256
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data27.20
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRage 4TU106
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)29 January 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1920
Core clock speed90 MHz975 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1185 MHz
Number of transistors8 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data65 Watt
Texture fill rate0.36142.2
Floating-point processing powerno data4.55 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs4120
Tensor Coresno data240
Ray Tracing Coresno data30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed90 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth720.0 MB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 29 January 2020
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 12 nm

RTX 2060 Max-Q has an age advantage of 20 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1983.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 and GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128
All-In-Wonder 128
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 7 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 385 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 or GeForce RTX 2060 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.