Matrox G450 x4 MMS vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)G400 (1999−2002)
GPU code nameRage 4Condor
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)1 January 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed120 MHz125 MHz
Number of transistors8 million10 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate0.480.25
ROPs42
TMUs42

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCI
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSGRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB32 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed120 MHz332 MBps
Memory bandwidth1.92 GB/s2.656 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.06.0
OpenGL1.2None
OpenCLN/ANone
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 1 January 2001
Chip lithography 250 nm 180 nm

Matrox G450 x4 MMS has an age advantage of 1 year, and a 38.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO and Matrox G450 x4 MMS. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
Matrox G450 x4 MMS
G450 x4 MMS

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 97 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 11 votes

Rate Matrox G450 x4 MMS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO or Matrox G450 x4 MMS, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.