GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRage 4GA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)6 July 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2048
Core clock speed120 MHz1237 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1492 MHz
Number of transistors8 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology250 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data75 Watt
Texture fill rate0.4895.49
Floating-point processing powerno data6.111 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs464
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSGRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed120 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.92 GB/s144.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 6 July 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 8 nm

RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh has an age advantage of 23 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 3025% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO and GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PRO is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.1 97 votes

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 99 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO or GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile Refresh, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.