Arc Pro A30M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated347
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameRage 4DG2-128
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (25 years ago)8 August 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed120 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2000 MHz
Number of transistors8 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.48128.0
Floating-point processing powerno data4.096 gflops
ROPs432
TMUs464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 4.0 x8
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSGRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 MB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed120 MHz16 GB/s
Memory bandwidth1.92 GB/s128.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 6 nm

Arc Pro A30M has an age advantage of 23 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4066.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO and Arc Pro A30M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PRO is a desktop card while Arc Pro A30M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO
Intel Arc Pro A30M
Arc Pro A30M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A30M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.