Radeon R7 240 OEM vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameRage 4Oland
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)1 November 2013 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data320
Core clock speed134 MHz730 MHz
Boost clock speedno data780 MHz
Number of transistors8 million950 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.5415.60
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4992 TFLOPS
ROPs48
TMUs420
L1 Cacheno data80 KB
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 3.0 x8
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed134 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.072 GB/s28.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (11_1)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 1 November 2013
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 28 nm

R7 240 OEM has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 792.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra and Radeon R7 240 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
AMD Radeon R7 240 OEM
Radeon R7 240 OEM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 57 votes

Rate Radeon R7 240 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra or Radeon R7 240 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.