Quadro FX 3000 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1479
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Rankine (2003−2005)
GPU code nameRage 4NV35
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)22 July 2003 (22 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$203

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed134 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors8 million135 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm130 nm
Texture fill rate0.543.200
ROPs44
TMUs48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 4xAGP 8x
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount32 MB256 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed134 MHz425 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.072 GB/s27.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.09.0a
OpenGL1.21.5 (2.1)
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 22 July 2003
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 250 nm 130 nm

FX 3000 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 92% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra and Quadro FX 3000. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 3000 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 8 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra or Quadro FX 3000, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.