GeForce 310M vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1390
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.65
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRage 4GT218
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)10 January 2010 (16 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed134 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors8 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data14 Watt
Texture fill rate0.544.848
Floating-point processing powerno data0.04896 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data73
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount32 MBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed134 MHzUp to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth1.072 GB/s10.67 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoDisplayPortHDMIVGADual Link DVISingle Link DVI
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Power managementno data8.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 10 January 2010
Chip lithography 250 nm 40 nm

GeForce 310M has an age advantage of 10 years, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra and GeForce 310M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra is a desktop graphics card while GeForce 310M is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 499 votes

Rate GeForce 310M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra or GeForce 310M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.