GeForce 210 vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.82
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameRage 4GT218S
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)12 October 2009 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$29.49

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed134 MHz589 MHz
Number of transistors8 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data30.5 Watt
Maximum GPU temperatureno data105 °C
Texture fill rate0.544.160
Floating-point processing powerno data0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs48
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceAGP 4xPCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Heightno data2.731" (6.9 cm)
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR2
Maximum RAM amount32 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed134 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth1.072 GB/s8.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-VideoDVIVGADisplayPort
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Audio input for HDMIno dataInternal

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.011.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGL1.23.1
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 12 October 2009
Maximum RAM amount 32 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 250 nm 40 nm

GeForce 210 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra and GeForce 210. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra
NVIDIA GeForce 210
GeForce 210

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1 1 vote

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 3998 votes

Rate GeForce 210 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PRO Ultra or GeForce 210, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.