Radeon E9550 MXM vs ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 4 (1998−1999)GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameRage 4Ellesmere
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date16 June 1999 (26 years ago)27 September 2016 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2304
Core clock speed90 MHz1120 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1266 MHz
Number of transistors8 million5,700 million
Manufacturing process technology250 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data95 Watt
Texture fill rate0.36182.3
Floating-point processing powerno data5.834 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs4144
L1 Cacheno data576 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIMXM-B (3.0)
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR5
Maximum RAM amount16 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed90 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth720.0 MB/s160.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 2x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.24.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 June 1999 27 September 2016
Maximum RAM amount 16 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 250 nm 14 nm

E9550 MXM has an age advantage of 17 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1685.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between All-In-Wonder 128 PCI and Radeon E9550 MXM. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that All-In-Wonder 128 PCI is a desktop graphics card while Radeon E9550 MXM is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
All-In-Wonder 128 PCI
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
Radeon E9550 MXM

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate All-In-Wonder 128 PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Radeon E9550 MXM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about All-In-Wonder 128 PCI or Radeon E9550 MXM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.