Radeon Instinct MI300X vs AeroBox GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)CDNA 3.0 (2023−2024)
GPU code nameKryptosAqua Vanjaram
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2020 (4 years ago)6 December 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores89619456
Core clock speed935 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHz2100 MHz
Number of transistorsno data153,000 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate55.162,554
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS81.72 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs561216
Tensor Coresno data1216

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB192 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz2525 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s5,171 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 6 December 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 192 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 750 Watt

AeroBox GPU has 650% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI300X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and Radeon Instinct MI300X. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook card while Radeon Instinct MI300X is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
AMD Radeon Instinct MI300X
Radeon Instinct MI300X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 59 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI300X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.