RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF vs AeroBox GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Blackwell 2.0 (2025)
GPU code nameKryptosGB203
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2020 (5 years ago)11 August 2025 (recently)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8968960
Core clock speed935 MHz790 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHz1337 MHz
Number of transistorsno data45,600 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate55.16374.4
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS23.96 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs56280
Tensor Coresno data280
Ray Tracing Coresno data70

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 5.0 x8
Lengthno data167 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount8 GB24 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz1125 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s432.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1b

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 11 August 2025
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 70 Watt

RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF has an age advantage of 5 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 220% more advanced lithography process, and 42.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook graphics card while RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF
RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 680 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about AeroBox GPU or RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell SFF, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.