GeForce RTX 4060 vs AeroBox GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated83
Place by popularitynot in top-1006
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data93.28
Power efficiencyno data31.27
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2012−2020)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameKryptosAD107
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2020 (6 years ago)18 May 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8963072
Core clock speed935 MHz1830 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHz2460 MHz
Number of transistorsno data18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate55.16236.2
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS15.11 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs5696
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x8
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 12-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz2125 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s272.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 18 May 2023
Chip lithography 16 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 115 Watt

AeroBox GPU has 15% lower power consumption.

RTX 4060, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, and a 220% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and GeForce RTX 4060. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4060 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 680 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 30665 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4060 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about AeroBox GPU or GeForce RTX 4060, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.