A100 PCIe 80 GB vs AeroBox GPU

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGCN 1.0 (2011−2020)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameKryptosGA100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date13 March 2020 (4 years ago)28 June 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8966912
Core clock speed935 MHz1065 MHz
Boost clock speed985 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistorsno data54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate55.16609.1
Floating-point processing power1.765 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs16160
TMUs56432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 GB80 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz1593 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s2,039 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGLN/AN/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1N/A
CUDA-8.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 March 2020 28 June 2021
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 80 GB
Chip lithography 16 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 250 Watt

AeroBox GPU has 150% lower power consumption.

A100 PCIe 80 GB, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between AeroBox GPU and A100 PCIe 80 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that AeroBox GPU is a notebook card while A100 PCIe 80 GB is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


AMD AeroBox GPU
AeroBox GPU
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB
A100 PCIe 80 GB

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 679 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 69 votes

Rate A100 PCIe 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.