Radeon PRO W6300 vs A40 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data40.78
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 24
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 October 2020 (5 years ago)19 January 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores10752768
Core clock speed1305 MHz1512 MHz
Boost clock speed1755 MHz2040 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million5,400 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)300 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate589.797.92
Floating-point processing power37.74 TFLOPS3.133 TFLOPS
ROPs11232
TMUs33648
Tensor Cores336no data
Ray Tracing Cores8412
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cache10.5 MB256 KB
L2 Cache6 MB1024 KB
L3 Cacheno data8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x4
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount48 GB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit32 Bit
Memory clock speed1812 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth695.8 GB/s64 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors3x DisplayPortNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL2.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 October 2020 19 January 2022
Maximum RAM amount 48 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 300 Watt 25 Watt

A40 PCIe has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount.

PRO W6300, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% more advanced lithography process, and 1100% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A40 PCIe and Radeon PRO W6300. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A40 PCIe
A40 PCIe
AMD Radeon PRO W6300
Radeon PRO W6300

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 89 votes

Rate A40 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO W6300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A40 PCIe or Radeon PRO W6300, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.