Radeon 680M vs A30 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated337
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.25
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGA100Rembrandt+
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date12 April 2021 (3 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3584768
Core clock speed930 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speed1440 MHz2200 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million13,100 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate322.6105.6
Floating-point processing power10.32 TFLOPS3.379 TFLOPS
ROPs9632
TMUs22448
Tensor Cores224no data
Ray Tracing Coresno data12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPSNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2System Shared
Maximum RAM amount24 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width3072 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth933.1 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.7
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL3.02.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 12 April 2021 3 January 2023
Chip lithography 7 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 50 Watt

Radeon 680M has an age advantage of 1 year, a 16.7% more advanced lithography process, and 230% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A30 PCIe and Radeon 680M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A30 PCIe is a workstation card while Radeon 680M is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A30 PCIe
A30 PCIe
AMD Radeon 680M
Radeon 680M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 11 votes

Rate A30 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 939 votes

Rate Radeon 680M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.