Radeon HD 7340 vs A100 SXM4

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1338
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data1.58
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameGA100Loveland
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)6 June 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$552.69

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores691280
Core clock speed1410 MHz523 MHz
Boost clock speedno data680 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million450 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate609.14.184
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.08368 TFLOPS
ROPs1604
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16IGP
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2ESystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model6.55.0
OpenGL4.64.4
OpenCL2.01.2
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 6 June 2012
Chip lithography 7 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 18 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 471% more advanced lithography process.

HD 7340, on the other hand, has 2122% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon HD 7340. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon HD 7340 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 73 votes

Rate Radeon HD 7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or Radeon HD 7340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.