ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1492
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data0.23
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGA100R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)1 March 2003 (23 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate609.13.040
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1608
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16AGP 8x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EDDR
Maximum RAM amount40 GB128 MB
Memory bus width5120 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s21.76 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model6.5no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 47 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 17 years, a 31900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2043% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has 751% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 179 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 59 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or Radeon 9800 PRO, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.