Radeon 610M vs A100 SXM4
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | not rated | 824 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 72 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 14.71 |
| Architecture | Ampere (2020−2025) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) |
| GPU code name | GA100 | Dragon Range |
| Market segment | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 14 May 2020 (5 years ago) | 3 January 2023 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 6912 | 128 |
| Core clock speed | 1410 MHz | 400 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2200 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 54,200 million | no data |
| Manufacturing process technology | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 609.1 | 17.60 |
| Floating-point processing power | 19.49 TFLOPS | 0.5632 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 160 | 4 |
| TMUs | 432 | 8 |
| Tensor Cores | 432 | no data |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 2 |
| L0 Cache | no data | 32 KB |
| L1 Cache | 20.3 MB | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 40 MB | 2 MB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 4.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Width | IGP | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | HBM2E | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 40 GB | System Shared |
| Memory bus width | 5120 Bit | System Shared |
| Memory clock speed | 1215 MHz | System Shared |
| Memory bandwidth | 1,555 GB/s | no data |
| Shared memory | - | + |
| Resizable BAR | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.140 | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 8.0 | - |
| DLSS | + | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 14 May 2020 | 3 January 2023 |
| Chip lithography | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 15 Watt |
Radeon 610M has an age advantage of 2 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 2566.7% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and Radeon 610M. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 610M is a notebook one.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
