GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition vs A100 SXM4

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGA100GT200B
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date14 May 2020 (5 years ago)16 February 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912240
Core clock speed1410 MHz633 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology7 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt219 Watt
Texture fill rate609.150.64
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.6221 TFLOPS
ROPs16028
TMUs43280
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MB224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2EGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount40 GB896 MB
Memory bus width5120 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed1215 MHz1134 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/s127.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model6.54.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL2.01.1
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.01.3
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 16 February 2010
Maximum RAM amount 40 GB 896 MB
Chip lithography 7 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 219 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 10 years, a 4471.4% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 685.7% more advanced lithography process.

GTX 275 PhysX Edition, on the other hand, has 82.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition
GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 or GeForce GTX 275 PhysX Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.