GMA X3100 vs A100 SXM4

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)Generation 4.0 (2006−2007)
GPU code nameGA100Broadwater
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date14 May 2020 (4 years ago)9 May 2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912no data
Core clock speed1410 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt13 Watt
Texture fill rate609.14.000
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPSno data
ROPs1601
TMUs4328
Tensor Cores432no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2ESystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount40 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1215 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth1,555 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)9.0c
Shader Model6.53.0
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL2.0N/A
Vulkan1.2.140N/A
CUDA8.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 May 2020 9 May 2007
Chip lithography 7 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 13 Watt

A100 SXM4 has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.

GMA X3100, on the other hand, has 2976.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 and GMA X3100. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 is a workstation card while GMA X3100 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4
Intel GMA X3100
GMA X3100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 57 votes

Rate GMA X3100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.