UHD Graphics 770 vs A100 SXM4 80 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated631
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.79
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2025)Generation 12.2 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameGA100Raptor Lake GT1
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date16 November 2020 (4 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6912256
Core clock speed1095 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1410 MHz1650 MHz
Number of transistors54,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology7 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)400 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate609.126.40
Floating-point processing power19.49 TFLOPS0.8448 TFLOPS
ROPs1608
TMUs43216
Tensor Cores432no data
L1 Cache20.3 MBno data
L2 Cache40 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16Ring Bus
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount80 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width5120 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1593 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth2,039 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+
Resizable BAR+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 (12_1)
Shader ModelN/A6.6
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL2.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA8.0-
DLSS+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 16 November 2020 27 September 2022
Chip lithography 7 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 400 Watt 15 Watt

A100 SXM4 80 GB has a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

UHD Graphics 770, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2566.7% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between A100 SXM4 80 GB and UHD Graphics 770. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that A100 SXM4 80 GB is a workstation graphics card while UHD Graphics 770 is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A100 SXM4 80 GB
A100 SXM4 80 GB
Intel UHD Graphics 770
UHD Graphics 770

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 81 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 80 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 1404 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A100 SXM4 80 GB or UHD Graphics 770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.