Radeon AI PRO R9700 vs A10 PCIe

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureAmpere (2020−2024)RDNA 4.0 (2025)
GPU code nameGA102Navi 48
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date12 April 2021 (4 years ago)July 2025

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores92164096
Core clock speed885 MHz1660 MHz
Boost clock speed1695 MHz2920 MHz
Number of transistors28,300 million53,900 million
Manufacturing process technology8 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate488.2747.5
Floating-point processing power31.24 TFLOPS47.84 TFLOPS
ROPs96128
TMUs288256
Tensor Cores288128
Ray Tracing Cores7264

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors8-pin EPS1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR6GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB32 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1563 MHz2518 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.2 GB/s644.6 GB/s
Resizable BAR++

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort 2.1a

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 Ultimate (12_2)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.66.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.02.2
Vulkan1.21.3
CUDA8.6-
DLSS++

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 8 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 300 Watt

A10 PCIe has 100% lower power consumption.

AI PRO R9700, on the other hand, has a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between A10 PCIe and Radeon AI PRO R9700. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA A10 PCIe
A10 PCIe
AMD Radeon AI PRO R9700
Radeon AI PRO R9700

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate A10 PCIe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Radeon AI PRO R9700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about A10 PCIe or Radeon AI PRO R9700, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.