RTX 4000 Ada Generation vs ATI 3D Rage

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated48
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.81
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameMach64 GTAD104
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 April 1996 (29 years ago)9 August 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6144
Core clock speed44 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2175 MHz
Number of transistors5 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.04417.6
Floating-point processing powerno data26.73 TFLOPS
ROPs164
TMUs1192
Tensor Coresno data192
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data6 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data245 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 MB20 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit160 Bit
Memory clock speed57 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth456.0 MB/s360.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA4x DisplayPort 1.4a

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1996 9 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 20 GB
Chip lithography 500 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation has an age advantage of 27 years, a 1023900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage and RTX 4000 Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage
3D Rage
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation
RTX 4000 Ada Generation

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 67 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage or RTX 4000 Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.