GeForce2 MX 200 vs ATI 3D Rage

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMach64 GTNV11 B2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 1996 (30 years ago)3 March 2001 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed44 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors5 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate0.040.7
ROPs12
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOSDR
Maximum RAM amount2 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed57 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth456.0 MB/s1.328 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.07.0
OpenGLN/A1.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1996 3 March 2001
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 500 nm 180 nm

GeForce2 MX 200 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 178% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage and GeForce2 MX 200. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 9 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 34 votes

Rate GeForce2 MX 200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage or GeForce2 MX 200, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.