Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU vs ATI 3D Rage

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)no data
GPU code nameMach64 GTno data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 1996 (28 years ago)17 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed44 MHzno data
Number of transistors5 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology500 nm5 nm
Texture fill rate0.04no data
ROPs1no data
TMUs1no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIno data
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeEDOLPDDR5-6400
Maximum RAM amount2 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed57 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth456.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAno data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.0no data
OpenGLN/Ano data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1996 17 January 2023
Chip lithography 500 nm 5 nm

Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU has an age advantage of 26 years, and a 9900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage and Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage is a desktop card while Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage
3D Rage
Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU
M2 Pro 16-Core GPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 194 votes

Rate Apple M2 Pro 16-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.