Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition vs ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataTesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameRage Pro TurboG84
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 March 1997 (28 years ago)27 September 2008 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data32
Core clock speed75 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors8 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data42 Watt
Texture fill rate0.088.320
Floating-point processing powerno data0.06656 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs116

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data168 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR3
Maximum RAM amount4 MB512 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed75 MHz650 MHz
Memory bandwidth600 MB/s20.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.011.1 (10_0)
Shader Modelno data4.0
OpenGL1.13.3
OpenCLNone1.1
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 27 September 2008
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 80 nm

FX 1700 Mac Edition has an age advantage of 11 years, a 12700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 337.5% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO Turbo and Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage PRO Turbo is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo
3D Rage PRO Turbo
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage PRO Turbo or Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.