GeForce RTX 5050 vs ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated114
Place by popularitynot in top-10060
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data96.26
Power efficiencyno data23.98
Architectureno dataBlackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameRage Pro TurboGB207
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 March 1997 (28 years ago)24 June 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2560
Core clock speed75 MHz2317 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2572 MHz
Number of transistors8 million16,900 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data130 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08205.8
Floating-point processing powerno data13.17 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs180
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data24 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 5.0 x8
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 MB8 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed75 MHz2500 MHz
Memory bandwidth600 MB/s320.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.4
CUDA-12.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 24 June 2025
Maximum RAM amount 4 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 5 nm

RTX 5050 has an age advantage of 28 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO Turbo and GeForce RTX 5050. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo
3D Rage PRO Turbo
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050
GeForce RTX 5050

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 759 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5050 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage PRO Turbo or GeForce RTX 5050, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.