UHD Graphics vs ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated666
Place by popularitynot in top-1003
Power efficiencyno data39.47
Architectureno dataGeneration 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRage Pro TurboJasper Lake GT1
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 1997 (28 years ago)11 January 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data256
Core clock speed75 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data750 MHz
Number of transistors8 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology350 nm10 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)no data10 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0812.00
Floating-point processing powerno data0.384 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs116

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount8 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed75 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth600 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DB13W3No outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 11 January 2021
Chip lithography 350 nm 10 nm

UHD Graphics has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 3400% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI and UHD Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI is a desktop graphics card while UHD Graphics is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI
Intel UHD Graphics
UHD Graphics

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 9527 votes

Rate UHD Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage PRO Turbo PCI or UHD Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.