GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile vs ATI 3D Rage PRO AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated329
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data28.71
ArchitectureRage 3 (1997−1998)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameRage PROTU116
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 March 1997 (29 years ago)23 April 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data1024
Core clock speed75 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1485 MHz
Number of transistors8 million6,600 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data50 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0895.04
Floating-point processing powerno data3.041 TFLOPS
ROPs132
TMUs164
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data1024 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfaceAGP 1xPCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 MB4 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed75 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth600.0 MB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 1997 23 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 2 MB 4 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 12 nm

GTX 1650 Ti Mobile has an age advantage of 23 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 2817% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage PRO AGP and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 2027 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage PRO AGP or GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.