RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile vs ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated66
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data36.80
Architectureno dataAda Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameRage LTAD104
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date1 November 1997 (28 years ago)21 March 2023 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data7424
Core clock speed75 MHz1290 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1665 MHz
Number of transistors8 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data110 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08386.3
Floating-point processing powerno data24.72 TFLOPS
ROPs180
TMUs1232
Tensor Coresno data232
Ray Tracing Coresno data58
L1 Cacheno data7.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 MB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth800 MB/s432.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.8
OpenGL1.14.6
OpenCLNone3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1997 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 5 nm

RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile has an age advantage of 25 years, a 153500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 6900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage LT PRO AGP and RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile
RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 45 votes

Rate RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage LT PRO AGP or RTX 4000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.