Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRage LTNV17 A3
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 November 1997 (27 years ago)16 July 2004 (21 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed75 MHz220 MHz
Number of transistors8 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data18 Watt
Texture fill rate0.080.88 ×2
ROPs12 ×2
TMUs14 ×2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCI
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount8 MB64 MB ×2
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed100 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth800 MB/s5.312 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data2x LFH60

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.08.0
OpenGL1.11.3
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1997 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 64 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 150 nm

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI has an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage LT PRO AGP and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage LT PRO AGP or Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.