GeForce 256 DDR vs ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataCelsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameRage LTNV10 A3
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 November 1997 (28 years ago)23 December 1999 (25 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed75 MHz120 MHz
Number of transistors8 million17 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm220 nm
Texture fill rate0.080.48
ROPs14
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xAGP 4x
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRDDR
Maximum RAM amount8 MB32 MB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz150 MHz
Memory bandwidth800 MB/s4.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x VGA

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.07.0
OpenGL1.11.2
OpenCLNoneN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1997 23 December 1999
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 32 MB
Chip lithography 350 nm 220 nm

256 DDR has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 59.1% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage LT PRO AGP and GeForce 256 DDR. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
NVIDIA GeForce 256 DDR
GeForce 256 DDR

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 280 votes

Rate GeForce 256 DDR on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage LT PRO AGP or GeForce 256 DDR, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.