A100 SXM4 40 GB vs ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameRage LTGA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 November 1997 (27 years ago)14 May 2020 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data6912
Core clock speed75 MHz1095 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1410 MHz
Number of transistors8 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology350 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data400 Watt
Texture fill rate0.08609.1
Floating-point processing powerno data19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs1160
TMUs1432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRHBM2e
Maximum RAM amount8 MB40 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed100 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth800 MB/s1,555 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX6.0N/A
Shader Modelno dataN/A
OpenGL1.1N/A
OpenCLNone2.0
Vulkan-N/A
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 November 1997 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 8 MB 40 GB
Chip lithography 350 nm 7 nm

A100 SXM4 40 GB has an age advantage of 22 years, a 511900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage LT PRO AGP and A100 SXM4 40 GB. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage LT PRO AGP is a desktop graphics card while A100 SXM4 40 GB is a workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


ATI 3D Rage LT PRO AGP
3D Rage LT PRO AGP
NVIDIA A100 SXM4 40 GB
A100 SXM4 40 GB

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 3 votes

Rate 3D Rage LT PRO AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 21 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 40 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage LT PRO AGP or A100 SXM4 40 GB, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.