Iris Plus Graphics vs ATI 3D Rage IIC PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated720
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.92
ArchitectureRage 2 (1997)Generation 11.0 (2019−2021)
GPU code nameRage IICIce Lake GT2
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 April 1997 (29 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data512
Core clock speed60 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data1000 MHz
Number of transistors5 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology500 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0632.00
Floating-point processing powerno data1.024 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs132

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x1
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed83 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/sno data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_1)
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 500 nm 10 nm

Iris Plus Graphics has a 4900% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage IIC PCI and Iris Plus Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate 3D Rage IIC PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 493 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage IIC PCI or Iris Plus Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.