Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics vs ATI 3D Rage IIC AGP

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRage 2 (1997)GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)
GPU code nameRage IICSpectre Lite
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date1 April 1997 (29 years ago)17 February 2014 (12 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed60 MHz554 MHz
Boost clock speedno data800 MHz
Number of transistors5 million2,410 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data90 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0613.30
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4255 TFLOPS
ROPs18
TMUs124

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 2xIGP
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed83 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_0)
Shader Modelno data6.0
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 April 1997 17 February 2014
Chip lithography 500 nm 28 nm

R7 Mobile Graphics has an age advantage of 16 years, and a 1686% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage IIC AGP and Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage IIC AGP is a desktop graphics card while Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 14 votes

Rate 3D Rage IIC AGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 6 votes

Rate Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage IIC AGP or Radeon R7 Mobile Graphics, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.