ATI Radeon HD 4250 IGP vs ATI 3D Rage II

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameMach64 GT-BRS880
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date5 September 1996 (29 years ago)1 March 2010 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data40
Core clock speed60 MHz498 MHz
Boost clock speedno data560 MHz
Number of transistors5 million181 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm55 nm
Texture fill rate0.062.240
Floating-point processing powerno data0.0448 TFLOPS
ROPs14
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed83 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGANo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.010.1 (10_1)
Shader Modelno data4.1
OpenGLN/A3.3
OpenCLN/A1.0
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 1996 1 March 2010
Chip lithography 500 nm 55 nm

ATI HD 4250 IGP has an age advantage of 13 years, and a 809% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage II and Radeon HD 4250 IGP. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate 3D Rage II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 13 votes

Rate Radeon HD 4250 IGP on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage II or Radeon HD 4250 IGP, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.