Iris Plus Graphics 645 vs ATI 3D Rage II

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated727
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data21.46
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameMach64 GT-BCoffee Lake GT3e
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date5 September 1996 (29 years ago)7 October 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$269 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed60 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1050 MHz
Number of transistors5 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology500 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)no data15 Watt
Texture fill rate0.0650.40
Floating-point processing powerno data0.8064 TFLOPS
ROPs16
TMUs148

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIRing Bus
Width1-slotno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed83 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGAPortable Device Dependent

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 September 1996 7 October 2019
Chip lithography 500 nm 14 nm

Iris Plus Graphics 645 has an age advantage of 23 years, and a 3471% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage II and Iris Plus Graphics 645. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that 3D Rage II is a desktop graphics card while Iris Plus Graphics 645 is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate 3D Rage II on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 125 votes

Rate Iris Plus Graphics 645 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage II or Iris Plus Graphics 645, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.