GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 vs ATI 3D Rage II+ DVD

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureMach (1992−1997)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameMach64 GT-BCrush11
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 September 1996 (29 years ago)4 June 2001 (24 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Core clock speed60 MHz175 MHz
Number of transistors5 million20 million
Manufacturing process technology500 nm180 nm
Texture fill rate0.060.7
ROPs12
TMUs14

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIAGP 4x
Width1-slotIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSDRSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amount4 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width64 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed83 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth664.0 MB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX5.07.0
OpenGLN/A1.2
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 September 1996 4 June 2001
Chip lithography 500 nm 180 nm

GeForce2 MX + nForce 220 has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 178% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between 3D Rage II+ DVD and GeForce2 MX + nForce 220. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 7 votes

Rate 3D Rage II DVD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 1 vote

Rate GeForce2 MX nForce 220 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about 3D Rage II+ DVD or GeForce2 MX + nForce 220, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.