T400 Mobile vs Xe DG1

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDG1TU117
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2020 (6 years ago)no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640896
Core clock speed900 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1550 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors5,000 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate62.0079.80
Floating-point processing power1.984 TFLOPS2.554 TFLOPS
ROPs2032
TMUs4056
L2 Cache1024 KBno data
L3 Cache16 MBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x8PCIe 3.0 x16
Length164 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeLPDDR4XGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2133 MHz10 GB/s
Memory bandwidth68.26 GB/s80 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPortNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.66.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.2
CUDA-7.5

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 18 Watt

Xe DG1 has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 20% more advanced lithography process.

T400 Mobile, on the other hand, has 67% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe DG1 and T400 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xe DG1 is a desktop graphics card while T400 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 34 votes

Rate Xe DG1 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate T400 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xe DG1 or T400 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.