GeForce RTX 4090 vs Xe Arctic Sound

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated3
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data31.29
Power efficiencyno data15.70
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameArctic SoundAD102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release dateno data20 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores409616384
Core clock speed900 MHz2235 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2520 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million76,300 million
Manufacturing process technology10 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt450 Watt
Texture fill rate230.41,290.2
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS82.58 TFLOPS
ROPs128176
TMUs256512
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data128
L1 Cacheno data16 MB
L2 Cacheno data72 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length267 mm304 mm
Width2-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount32 GB24 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/s1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s1.01 TB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.8
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 24 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 450 Watt

Xe Arctic Sound has a 33% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 4090, on the other hand, has a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 11% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe Arctic Sound and GeForce RTX 4090. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 18237 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xe Arctic Sound or GeForce RTX 4090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.