GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs Xe Arctic Sound

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated358
Place by popularitynot in top-10052
Power efficiencyno data29.69
ArchitectureGeneration 12.5 (2021−2023)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameArctic SoundGA107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release dateno data17 December 2021 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores40962048
Core clock speed900 MHz1185 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1477 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology10 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)500 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate230.494.53
Floating-point processing power7.373 TFLOPS6.05 TFLOPS
ROPs12832
TMUs25664
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 4.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x8
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeHBM2eGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount32 GB4 GB
Memory bus width4096 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed2.4 GB/s1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth1,229 GB/s112.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.56.6
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL3.03.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Maximum RAM amount 32 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 10 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 500 Watt 45 Watt

Xe Arctic Sound has a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process, and 1011% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Xe Arctic Sound and GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xe Arctic Sound is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xe Arctic Sound on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3388 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xe Arctic Sound or GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.