Arc Graphics 2 Xe vs Xclipse 920 GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureRDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)Xe3-LPG (2026−2027)
GPU code nameVan Gogh LiteNova Lake-S
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date25 February 2022 (4 years ago)2027

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384256
Core clock speed303 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed1306 MHz2300 MHz
Manufacturing process technology4 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate31.3436.80
ROPs248
TMUs2416
Ray Tracing Cores62
L0 Cache96 KBno data
L1 Cache192 KB128 KB
L2 Cache1024 KB16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsPortable Device DependentPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXN/A12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader ModelN/A6.9
OpenGLES 3.24.6
OpenCL3.03.0
Vulkan1.31.4

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 4 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 25 Watt

Xclipse 920 GPU has 40% lower power consumption.

Arc Graphics 2 Xe, on the other hand, has a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xclipse 920 GPU and Arc Graphics 2 Xe. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xclipse 920 GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Arc Graphics 2 Xe on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xclipse 920 GPU or Arc Graphics 2 Xe, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.