CMP 40HX vs Xbox One S GPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated255
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data12.61
Power efficiencyno data10.94
ArchitectureGCN 1 (2016)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameDurango 2TU106
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 August 2016 (10 years ago)25 February 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$399 $699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7682304
Core clock speed914 MHz1470 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1650 MHz
Number of transistors5 billion10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology16 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)95 Watt185 Watt
Texture fill rate43.87237.6
Floating-point processing powerno data7.603 TFLOPS
ROPs1664
TMUs48144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data2.3 MB
L2 Cache512 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceIGPPCIe 1.0 x4
Length295 mm229 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount8 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1066 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth68.22 GB/s448.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x HDMI 2.0aNo outputs
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGLN/A4.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.11.3
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 August 2016 25 February 2021
Chip lithography 16 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 95 Watt 185 Watt

Xbox One S GPU has 49% lower power consumption.

CMP 40HX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 25% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xbox One S GPU and CMP 40HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xbox One S GPU is a desktop graphics card while CMP 40HX is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 199 votes

Rate Xbox One S GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 75 votes

Rate CMP 40HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Xbox One S GPU or CMP 40HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.